
| Title | Participation through Automation: Fully Automated Critical Peak Pricing in Commercial Buildings |
| Publication Type | Conference Paper |
| LBNL Report Number | LBNL-60614 |
| Year of Publication | 2006 |
| Authors | Piette, Mary Ann, David S. Watson, Naoya Motegi, Sila Kiliccote, and Eric Linkugel |
| Conference Name | 2006 ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings |
| Date Published | 06/2006 |
| Conference Location | Pacific Grove, CA |
| Keywords | market and value, market sectors |
| Abstract | California electric utilities have been exploring the use of dynamic critical peak prices (CPP) and other demand response programs to help reduce peaks in customer electric loads. CPP is a tariff design to promote demand response. Levels of automation in DR can be defined as follows. Manual Demand Response involves a potentially labor-intensive approach such as manually turning off or changing comfort set points at each equipment switch or controller. Semi-Automated Demand Response involves a pre-programmed response strategy initiated by a person via centralized control system. Fully Automated Demand Response does not involve human intervention, but is initiated at a home, building, or facility through receipt of an external communications signal. The receipt of the external signal initiates pre-programmed demand response strategies. We refer to this as Auto-DR. This paper describes the development, testing, and results from automated CPP (Auto-CPP) as part of a utility project in California. The paper presents the project description and test methodology. This is followed by a discussion of Auto-DR strategies used in the field test buildings. We present a sample Auto-CPP load shape case study, and a selection of the Auto-CPP response data from September 29, 2005. If all twelve sites reached their maximum saving simultaneously, a total of approximately 2 MW of DR is available from these twelve sites that represent about two million ft2. The average DR was about half that value, at about 1 MW. These savings translate to about 0.5 to 1.0 W/ft2 of demand reduction. We are continuing field demonstrations and economic evaluations to pursue increasing penetrations of automated DR that has demonstrated ability to provide a valuable DR resource for California. |
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| 385.51 KB |